Man In The Maze

by Rich Luhr, Editor of Airstream Life magazine

  • About
  • Follow
    • Twitter
  • My books
    • Exploring National Parks
    • Newbies Guide To Airstreaming
    • Airstream trailer maintenance guide
  • “How To Airstream” blog
  • Store
  • Back to Airstream Life
You are here: Home / Airstream / “How’s that Ranger tow?”

Aug 01 2021

“How’s that Ranger tow?”

I get this question frequently as I’m at the gas pumps with the Airstream, and I know a few readers of this blog have been wondering as well. Having reached the one-year anniversary of towing with our 2019 Ford Ranger, I feel like I’ve gathered enough experience to offer a report.

Our 2019 Ford Ranger XLT with its best friend, a 2020 Airstream Globetrotter 23FB

The Ranger freaks people out because it’s a “compact” truck and it offers only 4 cylinders. Never mind that it’s as big as trucks used to be in the 1980s and that it has much more power output—it’s very common these days that people expect trucks for towing to be huge and massively over-powered. If you look beyond the physical size and lack of a “V10” emblem, the specs are undeniably impressive.

Our travel trailer is not particularly heavy or difficult to tow. It’s a 2020 Airstream Globetrotter 23FB which weighs 5,460 pounds empty, and about 6,000 to 6,200 fully loaded for travel. (The maximum weight, or GVWR, is 6,300 pounds.)

The 2019 and later Ford Ranger has a manufacturer’s tow rating of 7,500 pounds. Although I don’t generally put a lot of stock in manufacturer tow ratings, as they are heavily influenced by marketing needs, in this case I consider Ford’s rating pretty realistic.

The diminutive 2.3 liter “Ecoboost” engine is an astonishing feat of modern engineering. By comparison, my first Ford Ranger back in 1998, boasted a 3 liter V6 but it was truly the most gutless and slow thing I ever drove (and that includes my 1967 VW Bug). It was suitable for towing a pop-up camper at most—and then only if you could avoid steep hills.

Three decades of engineering advances have made an enormous difference. The 2019 and later Rangers bear no resemblance to the earlier ones whatsoever. Hard-working engineers and scientists have figured out how to extract an astonishing 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque out of those four little cylinders. That’s more than enough to pull our Airstream up a steep (8%) grade without slowing down.

Part of the trick is turbocharging, and another contribution comes from the 10-speed auto transmission. But without going into a piston-head dissertation, suffice it to say I’ve been satisfied with the power. So there goes the question, “Can that little truck pull that Airstream?”

Yes, it can. Read on for more …

Camped in Rhinebeck, NY after 2,000+ miles of towing and a month on the road

We chose the SuperCrew variant of Ranger because we have a dog who rides in the back, and we don’t carry a huge amount of stuff. This seems to be the popular version judging from the other Rangers we have seen on the road. The only downside is the short 5-foot bed, which requires removing at least one wheel from a bicycle if you want it to fit entirely in the bed. We’re going to put a hitch receiver on the back of the Airstream for a bike rack later.

We also went with a tonneau cover to keep stuff in the back dry and protected. If you’re tight on storage, consider a full pickup cap instead.

I do have mixed feelings about getting 2WD instead of 4WD. We would use four-wheel drive rarely and it does add a fair bit of weight to the vehicle, but when you need it you really need it. We bypassed a few interesting side trips in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park last year because 2WD just wouldn’t cut it on the deep sand.

Fuel economy is pretty typical for a gas truck pulling an Airstream—nothing to write home about. We get about 13 MPG towing with no wind at 65 MPH. If we push to 70 MPH on the wide open western highways, fuel economy drops precipitously. With a strong headwind we can see <10 MPG and at that point I usually slow down a bit to compensate.

Camped at Lost Dutchman State Park, Apache Junction AZ

Up to now this might sound like a Ford Ranger commercial, so let me give you a bit of the downside. Obviously it’s a smaller truck, so if you travel heavy you’ll probably find it to be lacking for cargo-hauling space. And of course if you’ve got a 28-foot or longer Airstream it’s probably not for you.

For me, the big disappointment of the Ranger has been the handling and ride. Now keep in mind that my previous tow vehicles were Mercedes GL’s (two of them, a 2009 and a 2015). Despite being a large SUV with capacity to seat 7 people, towing with the Mercedes GL is a sublime experience, calm and lulling to the point that I seriously worried about falling asleep at the wheel.

The Mercedes GL tracks so straight and easily that you can drive across the USA with a single finger at the wheel. It has an all-wheel drive system that is really good, to the point that I never hesitated to take it off-roading. The handling is precise enough to challenge smaller cars at the track, and the ride is beautifully smooth thanks to an air suspension that is designed to cruise the Autobahn.

After that, the Ranger is a huge letdown. “Hey, it’s a truck” is what everyone says when I enumerate its shortcomings in handling. What they mean is that it bounces over uneven pavement, wanders like a butterfly when there are ruts in the road, and exhibits understeer that can be quite alarming on a curvy road.

From what I understand, this is partly the result of decades on non-engineering on the suspension. Like virtually every other pickup truck on the road it has a crude solid rear axle spring suspension that has barely progressed in sophistication since Eisenhower was president. What it needs is a decent fully-independent suspension designed to keep the wheels on the road, but don’t get me started on that rant.

The dinosaur-era suspension is made worse by an apparently deliberate choice by Ford to tune the steering to have a slight understeer. This is what they think truck owners like, I guess. When towing, the understeer becomes quite apparent.

The bottom line here is: It’s a truck, and probably not even among the better handling trucks available today. But if you didn’t just transition from a Mercedes GL, you may not notice.

A quick stop for lunch at Flaming Gorge National Rec Area, Utah, elevation 6,000

I’ll be the first to admit the comparison between a $30k Ford Ranger and a $70k Mercedes GL is not fair. For the money, the Ranger is a much better value. I switched out of the Mercedes family after 10 years of ownership because the maintenance costs of the GL were ridiculous. Routine service, every 30K miles, was approaching $2,000.

To put it another way, I sold the 2015 Mercedes with enough residual value to buy the 2019 Ranger for cash, lightly used, with a 7-year extended warranty. It hasn’t needed any service since beyond an inexpensive oil change. Considering that, I can’t complain about the downgrade in handling too much.

Red Canyon, Utah, in the Dixie National Forest near Bryce Canyon UT

If you have or buy one of these Rangers for towing, I have a couple of tips.

First off, always use the Tow/Haul mode. I was so entranced by the engine power that I thought, “No need for Tow/Haul”—and that was a mistake. It turns out that the Tow/Haul mode does more than just adjust the transmission’s shift points. Without it, a fault was triggered when we hit long 8% grades. We got a Powertrain Malfunction Light (which is a yellow wrench in the cluster) and a Check Engine Light, and the engine immediately went into limp mode. These lights eventually reset themselves, usually after turning off the engine.

This happened three times on a particularly hilly trip through Utah before I clued in and started using Tow/Haul mode. Surprise, surprise, no more problems after that.

Second, the fuel tank of the Ranger is sadly undersized for towing. A meager 18 gallons goes pretty quickly at 13 MPG, when allowing for a reasonable reserve. We stop for fuel about every 150-170 miles, but fortunately that jibes with our need for doggie breaks, bathroom breaks, and driver swaps. Plan accordingly.

The other thing that’s often overlooked in tow vehicle reviews is how the vehicle behaves when not towing. The Ranger’s small size works in its favor here, being reasonably easy to drive and park, and offering good fuel economy (for us) of about 22 City and 30 Highway. The handling, however is still truck-like.

Dry camping in Organ Pipe National Monument, Arizona

Would I buy it again? Probably yes. For our needs, a small truck is fine, and it’s a decent around-town vehicle when we need it. But also, we can’t fit a full size truck in our carport at home and so our options are limited. I’ve thought about whether we’d go to a full-size truck if we didn’t have the carport limitation, and I don’t think we would. The Ranger does the job.

Written by RichLuhr · Categorized: Airstream

Comments

  1. David B Johnson says

    August 1, 2021 at 5:05 pm

    Very interesting Maze installment. I’ve often wondered about the Ranger in comparison to the Tacoma and the like. Ford does a good job with their small displacement engines and turbochargers. Ford does need to re-engineer their suspensions to be competitive.

    Thanks for your insights into the Ranger.

    David

Recent Posts

  • Upgrading: Bike rack
  • Upgrading: Bathroom vent
  • “How’s that Ranger tow?”
  • Time to roam differently
  • Say this over my grave

Archives

  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008

Categories

  • Airstream
  • Airstream Life magazine
  • Alumafandango
  • Alumafiesta
  • Alumaflamingo
  • Alumapalooza
  • Asia
  • Bicycling
  • Books
  • Caravel
  • Current Events
  • Electrical
  • EUC
  • Europe
  • FAQs
  • Ford Ranger
  • Ford Ranger
  • Globetrotter 23FB
  • Home life
  • Interstate motorhome
  • Maintenance
  • Mercedes
  • Mercedes 300D
  • Mercedes GL320
  • Modernism Week
  • Motorcycling
  • Musings
  • National Parks
  • Photos
  • PTX
  • Recipes
  • Renovation
  • Roadtrips
  • Temporary Bachelor Man
  • Tesla
  • Tucson places
  • Uncategorized
  • Upgrades
  • Vehicles

©2004–2015 Church Street Publishing, Inc. “Airstream” used with permission · Site design by Jennifer Mead Creative